How long does rezoning take in Temora Shire Council?
Every figure below is computed from the official register records for this council. Counts and gazettal years come from full register history; pipeline duration only from what we have directly observed.
- Amendments tracked
- 1
- full register history
- Active last 12 months
- 0
- by latest status date
- Approval rate
- —
- no outcomes recorded yet
- Observed pipeline duration
- —
- insufficient data yet (0 of 5 cases observed)
Development applications · last 12 months
Applications lodged in this council in the trailing 12 months, by current status. Counted directly from the development application register.
- Total lodged
- 102
- last 12 months
- Lodged
- 0
- Under assessment
- 1
- Determined
- 99
- Withdrawn
- 2
Decision speed
How quickly this council determines a development application, measured from lodgement to determination across every decided application that carries both dates.
- Median time to decision
- 20 days
- half are decided faster than this
- Average
- 26 days
- a few slow cases pull this up
- Based on
- 214
- determined applications
Recent amendments
| Amendment | Stage | Status date | Gazettal | Outcome |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Amendment No 9 - Amend Temora LEP 2010 - Rezone land at Ariah Park to RU1 Primary Production, RU5 Village and R5 Large Lot Residential and amend minimum lot size controls | Withdrawn | 2 June 2021 | · | · |
Planning disputes
2 on recordPlanning and environment court and tribunal matters naming Temora Shire Council, newest first. Each links to the full public judgment.
| Matter | Court | Decided |
|---|---|---|
| Temora Shire Council v Stein [2004] NSWCA 236 NEGLIGENCE - tripping case - raised edge of driveway across footpath - obvious in daylight to pedestrian taking reasonable care for own safety - plaintiff tripped at night - evidence of street light across road - no evidence of state of illumination of driveway or that plaintiff could not or did not see it - defendant owed duty of care - correct question whether in breach of duty - action or inaction of reasonable council to be assessed on basis of pedestrians taking reasonable care for own safe | NSWCA | 21 July 2004 |
| THE PUBLIC TRUSTEE and ORS v THE COMMONWEALTH OF AUSTRALIA [1995] NSWCA 380 | NSWCA | 20 Dec 1995 |
Discovery signals matched on council name. We link to the public judgment; we do not reproduce its text.
How these numbers are computed
- Volume and gazettals per year count register records directly, full history from the source register.
- Approval rate is recorded outcomes beginning “Approved” over all recorded outcomes. Cases still in flight have no outcome and are excluded.
- Observed pipeline duration is the median days between our first and last stage observation for cases we watched move into approved/gazetted: an observed duration accruing since 12 June 2026, not lodgement-to-gazettal elapsed time, which the registers' list data cannot support. Medians are suppressed below 5 observed cases rather than reported on thin samples.
- Development applications are counted directly from the development application register over the trailing 12 months, grouped by their current canonical status. The full list is on the applications page.