NSW register name: Mosman Municipal Council Briefing (PDF) View on the map

How long does rezoning take in Mosman Municipal Council?

Every figure below is computed from the official register records for this council. Counts and gazettal years come from full register history; pipeline duration only from what we have directly observed.

Amendments tracked
5
full register history
Active last 12 months
3
by latest status date
Approval rate
75%
of 4 recorded outcomes
Observed pipeline duration
insufficient data yet (0 of 5 cases observed)

Development applications · last 12 months

Applications lodged in this council in the trailing 12 months, by current status. Counted directly from the development application register.

Total lodged
287
last 12 months
Lodged
0
Under assessment
66
Determined
199
Withdrawn
22

See all development applications in Mosman Municipal Council

Decision speed

How quickly this council determines a development application, measured from lodgement to determination across every decided application that carries both dates.

Median time to decision
87 days
half are decided faster than this
Average
100 days
a few slow cases pull this up
Based on
565
determined applications

Recent amendments

Planning disputes

20 on record

Planning and environment court and tribunal matters naming Mosman Municipal Council, newest first. Each links to the full public judgment.

MatterCourtDecided
Daly v Mosman Municipal Council [2024] NSWLEC 107 NOTICE OF MOTION — Civil procedure — Extension of time to commence judicial review proceedings under r 59.10(2) of the Uniform Civil Procedure Rules 2005 (NSW) — Summons filed 10 years after relevant decision made — Mosman Municipal Council decision to impose condition on development consent — Public interest raisedNSWLEC13 Sept 2024
Mosman Municipal Council v Spice (No 3) [2015] NSWLEC 189 COSTS – successful appellant prosecutor moves for orders that respondents pay costs of appeal from Local Court.NSWLEC3 Dec 2015
Blakeney v Mosman Municipal Council (No 2) [2013] NSWLEC 100 DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION - proposed provision of on-site car parking area and construction of an access driveway along an unformed road - whether that road was a 'public road' within the meaning of the Roads Act 1993 - whether the Court had the power to consent under s 138 of the Roads Act to construct the access driveway on that road - application of s 39(2) of the Land and Environment Court Act 1979 - impact of driveway construction for private use of land zoned for public recreation purposes -NSWLEC11 July 2013
Kelly v Mosman Municipal Council [2010] NSWCA 370 APPEAL – Court of Appeal – jurisdiction and powers – power of single judge to make decision about extension of time to appeal or seek leave to appeal – PRACTICE – parties – representation – assistance of unrepresented litigant by a McKenzie friend – whether desirable to make order granting leave for representation by McKenzie friend at future hearings – PRACTICE – order for pro bono assistance – relevant considerations for deciding that it is in the interests of justice to make the order – PRACTNSWCA13 Dec 2010
Mosman Municipal Council v Kelly (No 6) [2010] NSWLEC 20 CONTEMPT :- Disobedience to court order to demolish building - coercive purpose of contempt proceeding.NSWLEC23 Feb 2010
Mosman Municipal Council v Kelly (No 5) [2009] NSWLEC 186 PRACTICE AND PROCEDURE :- application to adjourn a contempt sentencing hearing on ground of respondent's ill health.NSWLEC30 Nov 2009
Mosman Municipal Council v Kelly (No 4) [2009] NSWLEC 115 PRACTICE AND PROCEDURE :- whether hearing in relation to penalty for contempt for disobeying a court order should be suspended pending determination of application for leave to appeal against decision that respondent is in contempt.NSWLEC23 June 2009
Mosman Municipal Council v Kelly (No 3) [2009] NSWLEC 92 CONTEMPT :- disobedience of an order to demolish a garage within a specified time - whether a proceeding for criminal or civil contempt - whether statement of charge deficient because did not allege that disobedience was contumacious - whether order had to be served - whether order void because no power to make it - whether order impossible of performance within the time specifiedNSWLEC19 June 2009
Mosman Municipal Council v David Kelly [2007] NSWLEC 90 Civil Enforcement :- erection of garage that required consent without consent - demolition - no appearance by respondent - proceedings heard ex parte - breach - discretion - stay of ordersNSWLEC19 Feb 2007
Mosman Municipal Council v Mitchelson [2002] NSWLEC 111 Prosecution :- guilty plea - penaltyNSWLEC11 July 2002
Gibson v Mosman Municipal Council [2001] NSWLEC 201 Costs :- class 1 proceedings - determination of preliminary issue of lawNSWLEC30 Aug 2001
Gibson v Mosman Municipal Council [2001] NSWLEC 134 Question of Law :- extent of Courts power pursuant to s 39(2) of the Land and Environment Court Act 1979 - s 138 of the Roads Act 1993NSWLEC22 June 2001
MacDonald v Mosman Municipal Council [2000] NSWLEC 67 Costs :- planning and building appeal - conduct of both parties amounting to exceptional circumstances - applicant's conduct cancels out entitlement to costs - costs of motion for costsNSWLEC11 Apr 2000
Vakili v Mosman Municipal Council [2000] NSWLEC 45 Development :- Residential flat building - non-compliance with development standards - height - bulk and scale - car parking - density - site coverage - adverse environmental impacts - SEPP 1 objectionsNSWLEC17 Mar 2000
Mosman M.C. -V- Sahade [1999] NSWLEC 44 :- Development consent - breach of conditions Building approval - breach of conditions Evidence - allegation obtained illegally - onus Evidence - effect of respondent electing not to call evidenceNSWLEC5 Mar 1999
Mosman Municipal Council v Sahade (No. 4) [1999] NSWLEC 203 Practice & Procedure :- application for adjournmentNSWLEC2 Mar 1999
Mosman Municipal Council v Sahade (No. 3) [1999] NSWLEC 202 Practice & Procedure :- amendment of claimNSWLEC1 Mar 1999
Mosman Municipal Council v Sahade (No. 2) [1999] NSWLEC 201 Practice & Procedure :- no case to answerNSWLEC1 Mar 1999
Binney v Mosman Municipal Council [1988] NSWLEC 132 :-NSWLEC15 Aug 1988
CHRISS v WILLIAMS [1988] NSWCA 22 NSWCA20 May 1988

Discovery signals matched on council name. We link to the public judgment; we do not reproduce its text.

How these numbers are computed

  • Volume and gazettals per year count register records directly, full history from the source register.
  • Approval rate is recorded outcomes beginning “Approved” over all recorded outcomes. Cases still in flight have no outcome and are excluded.
  • Observed pipeline duration is the median days between our first and last stage observation for cases we watched move into approved/gazetted: an observed duration accruing since 12 June 2026, not lodgement-to-gazettal elapsed time, which the registers' list data cannot support. Medians are suppressed below 5 observed cases rather than reported on thin samples.
  • Development applications are counted directly from the development application register over the trailing 12 months, grouped by their current canonical status. The full list is on the applications page.

Computed from 5 records from nsw-caselaw / nsw-online-da / NSW Planning Portal (PPR) / VIC Amendments Online, fetched 13 June 2026; data © state planning departments, licensed CC BY 4.0.

Zoning and planning data © State of New South Wales (Department of Planning, Housing and Infrastructure) and © State of Victoria (Department of Transport and Planning), licensed under CC BY 4.0. Basemap © OpenFreeMap © OpenMapTiles Data © OpenStreetMap contributors. Zoning renders for WA © Western Australian Land Information Authority and TAS © State of Tasmania.

Data sources update daily. State-by-state coverage · How to read the map · Zoning codes by state · How we compare