How long does rezoning take in Griffith City Council?
Every figure below is computed from the official register records for this council. Counts and gazettal years come from full register history; pipeline duration only from what we have directly observed.
- Amendments tracked
- 3
- full register history
- Active last 12 months
- 1
- by latest status date
- Approval rate
- 100%
- of 1 recorded outcome
- Observed pipeline duration
- —
- insufficient data yet (0 of 5 cases observed)
Development applications · last 12 months
Applications lodged in this council in the trailing 12 months, by current status. Counted directly from the development application register.
- Total lodged
- 293
- last 12 months
- Lodged
- 0
- Under assessment
- 53
- Determined
- 235
- Withdrawn
- 5
Decision speed
How quickly this council determines a development application, measured from lodgement to determination across every decided application that carries both dates.
- Median time to decision
- 37 days
- half are decided faster than this
- Average
- 47 days
- a few slow cases pull this up
- Based on
- 654
- determined applications
Recent amendments
| Amendment | Stage | Status date | Gazettal | Outcome |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Proposed Additional Permitted Use for Hostel at 390 Panorama Avenue, Mitchell | Lodged | 15 May 2026 | · | Approved |
| General Amendment - Griffith Local Environmental Plan 2014 | Withdrawn | 7 Oct 2022 | · | · |
| Additional Permitted Use for Lot 641 DP751743, 161 Remembrance Drive, Griffith | Withdrawn | 28 Nov 2020 | · | · |
Planning disputes
15 on recordPlanning and environment court and tribunal matters naming Griffith City Council, newest first. Each links to the full public judgment.
| Matter | Court | Decided |
|---|---|---|
| Terra Ag Services Pty Limited v Griffith City Council [2017] NSWLEC 167 APPEAL – appeal against a Commissioner’s decision on questions of law – refusal of development consent for rural supplies business – part of development held to be for prohibited purpose of “heavy industrial storage establishment” – whether development for one or more purposes – acceptance that development for more than one purpose – failure to characterise development as a whole – constructive failure to exercise jurisdiction to determine and give reasons for finding that development not for so | NSWLEC | 7 Dec 2017 |
| Burrell Place Community Action Group Incorporated v Griffith City Council [2009] NSWLEC 120 PRACTICE AND PROCEDURE :- security for costs - incorporated association - insufficient assets - power to order security for costs - relevant considerations | NSWLEC | 29 July 2009 |
| Bongiorno Hawkins Frassetto & Associates Pty Ltd v Griffith City Council [2007] NSWLEC 205 Appeal :- joinder of additional parties - whether issues would be sufficiently addressed absent joinder | NSWLEC | 30 Mar 2007 |
| Sumar Produce Pty Ltd v Griffith City Council [2000] NSWLEC 104 Orders :- noise control notice Costs :- class one - not a re-hearing | NSWLEC | 7 June 2000 |
| Sumar Produce Pty Ltd v Griffith City Council [2000] NSWLEC 72 Appeal from Administrative Decision :- noise control notice - appeal - setting of appropriate levels for frost control fan on agricultural land | NSWLEC | 11 Apr 2000 |
| Sumar Produce Pty Ltd v Griffith City Council [2000] NSWLEC 27 Question of Law :- statutory construction - power to vary noise control notice after appeal - power to vary noise control notice on appeal - power of delegation to council officer | NSWLEC | 15 Feb 2000 |
| BLACKTOWN CITY COUNCIL v LASSETER [1996] NSWCA 51 | NSWCA | 5 Dec 1996 |
| RAWLINSON AND BROWN PTY LTD v WITHAM [1995] NSWCA 542 | NSWCA | 12 Apr 1995 |
| DILLON v GOSFORD CITY COUNCIL [1995] NSWCA 124 | NSWCA | 7 Apr 1995 |
| McBRIDE v WALTON [1994] NSWCA 199 | NSWCA | 15 July 1994 |
| SPINKOVSKI v PUNCHBOWL BRICK and PIPE COMPANY PTY LTD [1992] NSWCA 236 | NSWCA | 11 Aug 1992 |
| CLIFT v WINDRUM [1991] NSWCA 54 | NSWCA | 2 Sept 1991 |
| PETER CECIL HARCOURT DAWSON v THE LAW SOCIETY OF NEW SOUTH WALES [1989] NSWCA 58 | NSWCA | 21 Dec 1989 |
| Savage & Ors v. Griffith City Council [1988] NSWLEC 135 :- | NSWLEC | 1 Sept 1988 |
| Polegato & Anor v. Griffith City Council [1988] NSWLEC 162 :- | NSWLEC | 10 Mar 1988 |
Discovery signals matched on council name. We link to the public judgment; we do not reproduce its text.
How these numbers are computed
- Volume and gazettals per year count register records directly, full history from the source register.
- Approval rate is recorded outcomes beginning “Approved” over all recorded outcomes. Cases still in flight have no outcome and are excluded.
- Observed pipeline duration is the median days between our first and last stage observation for cases we watched move into approved/gazetted: an observed duration accruing since 12 June 2026, not lodgement-to-gazettal elapsed time, which the registers' list data cannot support. Medians are suppressed below 5 observed cases rather than reported on thin samples.
- Development applications are counted directly from the development application register over the trailing 12 months, grouped by their current canonical status. The full list is on the applications page.