How long does rezoning take in Eurobodalla Shire Council?
Every figure below is computed from the official register records for this council. Counts and gazettal years come from full register history; pipeline duration only from what we have directly observed.
- Amendments tracked
- 1
- full register history
- Active last 12 months
- 1
- by latest status date
- Approval rate
- 100%
- of 1 recorded outcome
- Observed pipeline duration
- —
- insufficient data yet (0 of 5 cases observed)
Development applications · last 12 months
Applications lodged in this council in the trailing 12 months, by current status. Counted directly from the development application register.
- Total lodged
- 624
- last 12 months
- Lodged
- 0
- Under assessment
- 116
- Determined
- 491
- Withdrawn
- 17
See all development applications in Eurobodalla Shire Council
Decision speed
How quickly this council determines a development application, measured from lodgement to determination across every decided application that carries both dates.
- Median time to decision
- 34 days
- half are decided faster than this
- Average
- 57 days
- a few slow cases pull this up
- Based on
- 1,333
- determined applications
Recent amendments
| Amendment | Stage | Status date | Gazettal | Outcome |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Hawdon Street Moruya | Lodged | 22 Apr 2026 | · | Approved |
Planning disputes
20 on recordPlanning and environment court and tribunal matters naming Eurobodalla Shire Council, newest first. Each links to the full public judgment.
| Matter | Court | Decided |
|---|---|---|
| Nola Demuth v Eurobodalla Shire Council [2021] NSWLEC 10 ENVIRONMENT AND PLANNING – Land and Environment Court – review of Registrar’s directions – r 49.20 Uniform Civil Procedure Rules 2005 – exercise of discretion – venue for hearing and request for documents – motion dismissed COSTS – r 3.72(2) Land and Environment Court Rules 2007 – insufficient basis for costs application – no order made | NSWLEC | 2 Feb 2021 |
| Dolton v Eurobodalla Shire Council [2020] NSWLEC 141 APPEAL: whether Court has jurisdiction to hear the applicant’s claim – applicable legal principles in the exercise of the power to summarily dismiss proceedings – whether claim discloses reasonable cause of action – Court does not have jurisdiction – no reasonable cause of action disclosed in application – proceedings summarily dismissed – no costs order made because applicant encouraged to file proceedings in the Court. | NSWLEC | 2 Oct 2020 |
| Eurobodalla Fluoride Issues Inc v Eurobodalla Shire Council [2014] NSWLEC 182 ADMINISTRATIVE LAW - judicial review proceedings - whether the Council's decision to install and operate a fluoride dosing facility was valid - whether the Council's failure to obtain and consider an environmental impact statement amounted to a breach of s 112 of the Environmental Planning and Assessment Act 1979 - whether fluoridation of water supply likely to significantly affect the environment in terms of risks to human health - whether installation of the fluoride dosing facility involved t | NSWLEC | 28 Nov 2014 |
| Eurobodalla Shire Council v Gerondal (No 5) [2012] NSWLEC 180 JUDGMENTS AND ORDERS - Class 4 civil enforcement proceedings concerning waste on respondent's land - respondent's notices of motion after final | NSWLEC | 27 July 2012 |
| Eurobodalla Shire Council v Gerondal (No 4) [2012] NSWLEC 146 PRACTICE AND PROCEDURE - typographical errors in orders - application to amend orders pursuant to 'slip rule' - orders amended - application for order to inspect land - basis of power to order inspection - inspection ordered to give effect to earlier orders. | NSWLEC | 2 July 2012 |
| Eurobodalla Shire Council v Gerondal (No 2) [2012] NSWLEC 37 PROCEDURE - exercise of discretion - whether to vacate hearing dates in light of medical evidence | NSWLEC | 9 Mar 2012 |
| Eurobodalla Fluoride Issues Inc v Eurobodalla Shire Council [2011] NSWLEC 200 INTERLOCUTORY INJUNCTION: - to restrain construction and operation of fluoride dosage facility - balance of convenience. | NSWLEC | 10 Nov 2011 |
| Eurobodalla Shire Council v Gerondal [2011] NSWLEC 259 PROCEDURE - whether stay of proceedings on medical grounds ought be granted | NSWLEC | 28 Oct 2011 |
| Gerondal v Eurobodalla Shire Council (No 6) [2011] NSWLEC 132 CONTEMPT - conviction entered where no penalty imposed COSTS - whether costs ought be awarded on indemnity basis | NSWLEC | 4 Aug 2011 |
| Gerondal v Eurobodalla Shire Council (No 5) [2011] NSWLEC 104 CONTEMPT - failure to comply with court orders - whether civil or criminal contempt of court - whether contempt established beyond reasonable doubt | NSWLEC | 24 June 2011 |
| Gerondal v Eurobodalla Shire Council (No.3) [2010] NSWLEC 60 PRACTICE AND PROCEDURE :- Application by Notice of Motion for (1) extension of time and (2) variation of content, concerning orders made to remove materials from land; principles to apply to reopening of completed proceedings; are the orders final; costs | NSWLEC | 22 Apr 2010 |
| Gerondal v Eurobodalla Shire Council [2010] NSWLEC 52 PRACTICE AND PROCEDURE :- in the absence of a party his notice of motion seeking variation of orders was struck out - whether strike out order should be set aside. | NSWLEC | 12 Mar 2010 |
| Eurobodalla Shire Council v Christenssen [2008] NSWLEC 134 Prosecution :- prosecutor's appeal on ground of manifestly inadequate sentence - principles relating to Crown appeals against sentence applicable - penalty low but not manifestly inadequate - no error disclosed - appeal dismissed | NSWLEC | 8 Apr 2008 |
| Eurobodalla Shire Council v Leth [2007] NSWLEC 599 Environmental Offences :- owner of land which could not lawfully be used as a waste facility permitted that land to be used as a waste facility - no ongoing environmental harm - no money was received for deposit of waste material on land - guilty plea - penalty | NSWLEC | 21 May 2007 |
| Burns v Eurobodalla Shire Council [2006] NSWLEC 677 Compulsory Acquisition of Land :- amount of compensation – special value – capital gains tax – roll-over exemption – whether constitutes special value | NSWLEC | 2 Nov 2006 |
| Cameron v Eurobodalla Shire Council [2006] NSWLEC 47 Appeal :- appeal against severity of sentence of Local Court - appeal by way of rehearing - maximum penalty for offence - distinguished from jurisdictional limit of Local Court and amount of penalty notice - - guilty plea - appropriate sentence - offence committed on public land - actions resulting in offence committed knowingly and deliberately - actions taken to gain aesthetic and financial benefits - need for general deterrence - prevalence of offence - guilty plea and lack of prior criminali | NSWLEC | 13 Feb 2006 |
| Eurobodalla Shire Council v Dufty [2004] NSWCA 450 NEGLIGENCE - employer/employee versus independent contractor - incidents of each - liability of council for injury suffered by principal of private company engaged by Council to manage a swimming pool and its associated maintenance - damages. | NSWCA | 6 Dec 2004 |
| Marpet Enterprises v Eurobodalla Shire Council [2000] NSWLEC 159 Question of Law :- Proposed brothel development. Whether it satisfies locational constraints of LEP. Meaning of "adjacent to" or "within view of". Whether LEP provision is a development standard. | NSWLEC | 20 July 2000 |
| HUGHES BROS PTY LTD v MINISTER FOR PUBLIC WORKS [1994] NSWCA 141 | NSWCA | 17 Oct 1994 |
| FRIEND AND BROOKER PTY LTD v COUNCIL OF THE SHIRE OF EUROBODALLA [1993] NSWCA 103 | NSWCA | 24 Nov 1993 |
Discovery signals matched on council name. We link to the public judgment; we do not reproduce its text.
How these numbers are computed
- Volume and gazettals per year count register records directly, full history from the source register.
- Approval rate is recorded outcomes beginning “Approved” over all recorded outcomes. Cases still in flight have no outcome and are excluded.
- Observed pipeline duration is the median days between our first and last stage observation for cases we watched move into approved/gazetted: an observed duration accruing since 12 June 2026, not lodgement-to-gazettal elapsed time, which the registers' list data cannot support. Medians are suppressed below 5 observed cases rather than reported on thin samples.
- Development applications are counted directly from the development application register over the trailing 12 months, grouped by their current canonical status. The full list is on the applications page.