NSW register name: Cessnock City Council Briefing (PDF) View on the map

Development applications in Cessnock City Council

We have no rezoning amendments on record for this council yet, but we track its development applications. The figures below are counted directly from the development application register over the last 12 months.

Development applications · last 12 months

Applications lodged in this council in the trailing 12 months, by current status. Counted directly from the development application register.

Total lodged
969
last 12 months
Lodged
0
Under assessment
127
Determined
809
Withdrawn
33

See all development applications in Cessnock City Council

Decision speed

How quickly this council determines a development application, measured from lodgement to determination across every decided application that carries both dates.

Median time to decision
35 days
half are decided faster than this
Average
52 days
a few slow cases pull this up
Based on
2,029
determined applications

Planning disputes

20 on record

Planning and environment court and tribunal matters naming Cessnock City Council, newest first. Each links to the full public judgment.

MatterCourtDecided
Cessnock City Council v Laila Investments Pty Ltd [2012] NSWLEC 206 CIVIL ENFORCEMENT - declaration of invalidity of occupation certificate made - failure of private certifier to comply with mandatory provision in Environmental Planning and Assessment Act 1979NSWLEC21 Aug 2012
Cessnock City Council -v- Aviation and Leisure Corporation Pty Ltd [2012] NSWSC 221 CONTRACT - alternative dispute resolution clause - construction - PRACTICE AND PROCEDURE - application for permanent stay of proceedings on basis they have been instituted in breach of binding alternative dispute resolution provision - stay orderedNSWSC14 Mar 2012
SOCARES Support Group Inc v Cessnock City Council [2012] NSWLEC 23 JUDICIAL REVIEW - whether council decision not to tender for pound services in breach of tender obligations in Local Government Act 1993 - whether council could be satisfied of exceptions to requirement to tender contract for services - whether council satisfied of extenuating circumstances or unavailability of competitive or reliable tenders - whether mandatory relevant considerations not taken into account by council - whether irrelevant considerations taken into account by the council - grounNSWLEC21 Feb 2012
Cessnock City Council v Bimbadgen Estate Pty Ltd (No 2) [2011] NSWLEC 140 ENVIRONMENTAL OFFENCES: sentence - carrying out development without consent - whether works continued after stop work order - consideration of objective and subjective factors - extent of harm - whether the offence was committed intentionally - whether the offence was committed for financial gainNSWLEC16 Aug 2011
Cessnock City Council v Bimbadgen Estate Pty Ltd [2011] NSWLEC 136 PROCEDURE: application to adduce evidence by video link - documentary cross-examination - credit of witness in issue - evidence of witness central to proceedings - inconvenience to witness and cost to defendant not as great as suggested - application refusedNSWLEC9 Aug 2011
Hardie Holdings Pty Ltd v Cessnock City Council [2010] NSWLEC 11 PRACTICE AND PROCEDURE :- joinder of party - statutory authority seeking joinder to Class 1 proceedings - power to order joinder under s 39A - discretion - joinder refused - whether s 64(1) confers rights of appearance on Crown as intervenor or of some lesser status - issue not determined - costs - no order as to costsNSWLEC2 Feb 2010
ACM Landmark Pty Limited v Cessnock City Council [2006] NSWLEC 256 Costs :- applicant successful in class 1 appeal against council's refusal of s 96 modification application for the intensification of use of a crematorium - whether fair and reasonable to make costs order in favour of applicant - all expert evidence was in support of the modification application - resident's concerns relating to air quality, health, planning and traffic impacts had no rational evidentiary basis - council acted unreasonably having regard to evidence in maintaining opposition to aNSWLEC26 Apr 2006
ACM Landmark Pty Limited v Cessnock City Council [2006] NSWLEC 39 Practice and Procedure :- operation of slip ruleNSWLEC3 Feb 2006
Porters v Cessnock City Council [2005] NSWSC 1275 PROCEDURE – Supreme Court procedure – proceedings where deceased person’s estate has an interest, but is not represented – circumstances when appropriate to proceed in absence of any legal personal representative – EQUITY – equitable charges and liens – purchaser’s lien for amounts paid towards purchase price of land – when available – EQUITY – general principles and maxims of equity – equity regards as done that which ought to be done – terms contract for sale of land not completed in vendor’s NSWSC6 Dec 2005
Hunter Development Brokerage Pty Ltd v Cessnock City Council; Tovedale Pty Ltd v Shoalhaven City Council [2005] NSWCA 169 LAND AND ENVIRONMENT- Devlopment consents for subdivision of land - Whether consents had lapsed - Under Environmental Planning and Assessment Act, consent lapsed unless "building, engineering or construction work relating to" development was "physically commenced" upon land to which consent applied - Whether expression "building, engineering or construction work" was capable of including survey work and/or geotechnical investigation work - Whether survey work and/or geotechnical investigation woNSWCA23 May 2005
Cessnock City Council v Courtney (No. 6) [2004] NSWLEC 622 Prosecution :- whether the defendant carried out development without the requisite consent under s 76A(1)(a) of the Environmental Planning and Assessment Act 1979 thereby committing an offence against s 125(1) of such Act.NSWLEC12 Nov 2004
Cessnock City Council v Courtney (No. 5) [2004] NSWLEC 497 Prosecution :- Further application for a Prasad direction refusedNSWLEC31 Aug 2004
Biwazu Pty Limited v Cessnock City Council [2004] NSWLEC 411 Injunctions and Declarations :- lapse of consent - no physical commencement of work as required by s 95(4) Environmental Planning and Assessment Act 1979NSWLEC27 Aug 2004
Cessnock City Council v Courtney (No. 4) [2004] NSWLEC 489 Prosecution :- applications for a no case to answer direction or a Prasad direction refusedNSWLEC24 Aug 2004
Cessnock City Council v Courtney (No. 3) [2004] NSWLEC 488 Prosecution :- admissibility of records prepared by the defendant or prepared on the defendant's instructionsNSWLEC20 Aug 2004
Cessnock City Council v Courtney (No. 2) [2004] NSWLEC 487 Prosecution :- statement admitted for limited purpose of corroboration not for an unfavourable inferenceNSWLEC19 Aug 2004
Cessnock City Council v Courtney [2004] NSWLEC 486 Prosecution :- prior inconsistent statement - cross examination allowed confined to limited factual issueNSWLEC17 Aug 2004
Cessnock City Council v Suvaal [2001] NSWCA 428 NEGLIGENCE - bicycle accident - claim against council because of potholes in road - whether loss of steering control because hit potholes or hit potholes because of loss of steering control - on facts, the former not established - claim fails. ND.NSWCA5 Dec 2001
Cessnock City Council V Ireland [1999] NSWLEC 253 Practice & Procedure :- Practice and Procedure:- Permanent stay of mandatory injunction granted in respect of an unlawfully erected building after planning law position has been subsequently regularised.NSWLEC12 Nov 1999
Cessnock City Council v Heslop & Anor [1989] NSWLEC 199 :-NSWLEC1 June 1989

Discovery signals matched on council name. We link to the public judgment; we do not reproduce its text.

How these numbers are computed

  • Development applications are counted directly from the development application register over the trailing 12 months, grouped by their current canonical status. The full list is on the applications page.

Computed from 969 records from nsw-caselaw / nsw-online-da / NSW Planning Portal (PPR) / VIC Amendments Online, fetched 13 June 2026; data © state planning departments, licensed CC BY 4.0.

Zoning and planning data © State of New South Wales (Department of Planning, Housing and Infrastructure) and © State of Victoria (Department of Transport and Planning), licensed under CC BY 4.0. Basemap © OpenFreeMap © OpenMapTiles Data © OpenStreetMap contributors. Zoning renders for WA © Western Australian Land Information Authority and TAS © State of Tasmania.

Data sources update daily. State-by-state coverage · How to read the map · How we compare