Wentworth LEP 2011 Amendment No. 10 - Additional Permitted Use - Jewel Markets, Sturt Highway, Gol Gol

Stage history

1. Withdrawn

   source label: “withdrawn/Not Proceeding”

   Status date 25 Aug 2021 · Observed 12 June 2026 → current

More in Wentworth Shire Council

• Rezone RU1 land known as part 'Kelso Station', Pooncarie Rd Wentworth to permit rural residential development Withdrawn· 28 Nov 2020

Planning disputes in Wentworth Shire Council

Tribunal and court decisions naming this council, newest first. A signal of contested development in the area, not legal advice.

• Peregrine Mineral Sands Pty Ltd v Wentworth Shire Council [2015] NSWLEC 41 NSWLEC· 25 Mar 2015· Peregrine Mineral Sands Pty Ltd v Wentworth Shire Council [2015] NSWLEC 41 COSTS: - Class 3 proceedings - appeal against levying of a rate on the ground that the land is not rateable or not rateable to a particular ordinary or special rate - s 574 of the Local Government Act 1993 - proceedings discontinued - whether it is fair and reasonable for Court to make an order for the payment of costs - r 3.7 Land and Environment Court Rules 2007 (NSW) - whether applicants’ claim had reasonable prospects of success - attempts by applicants to limit costs not relevant to order f
• Peregrine Mineral Sands Pty Ltd v Wentworth Shire Council [2014] NSWCA 429 NSWCA· 11 Dec 2014· Peregrine Mineral Sands Pty Ltd v Wentworth Shire Council [2014] NSWCA 429 CONTRACTS - general contractual principles - construction and interpretation of contracts - where local council signed agreement with mining company for rates
• Wentworth Shire Council v Bemax Resources Limited and Ors (costs) [2013] NSWSC 1364 NSWSC· 12 Sept 2013· Wentworth Shire Council v Bemax Resources Limited and Ors (costs) [2013] NSWSC 1364 COSTS - whether or not costs should be ordered on the usual basis - whether the cost order should reflect the act that the relevant clause of the agreement was ultra vires - whether discovery was unnecessarily extensive - whether the class 3 proceedings were hopeless or the presumption under rule 3.7(3) of the Land and Environment Court Rules 2007(NSW) should be followed - whether the fact that proceedings were erroneously commenced against the joint venturers for the Gingko rates should have a
• Wentworth Shire Council v Bemax Resources Limited and Ors [2013] NSWSC 1047 NSWSC· 2 Aug 2013· Wentworth Shire Council v Bemax Resources Limited and Ors [2013] NSWSC 1047 CONTRACTS - construction of the contract - whether a clause limited council rates to $100K (plus "pegged" increases) for twenty years - issue of material to which the Court can have regard in the case of ambiguity and the relevance of the outcome of a particular construction (illegality or void contract) - alternative claims in estoppel and rectification raised but not determined. ADMINISTRATIVE LAW - whether the council's agreement to fix rates for twenty years in the manner contained in clause
• Peregrine Mineral Sands Pty Ltd v Wentworth Shire Council [2012] NSWLEC 237 NSWLEC· 19 Oct 2012· Peregrine Mineral Sands Pty Ltd v Wentworth Shire Council [2012] NSWLEC 237 PRACTICE AND PROCEDURE: transfer of proceedings to the Supreme Court
• PETTIGREW v WENTWORTH SHIRE COUNCIL [2012] NSWSC 624 NSWSC· 12 June 2012· PETTIGREW v WENTWORTH SHIRE COUNCIL [2012] NSWSC 624 TORTS - negligence - plaintiff lost control of motor vehicle - presence of loose gravel on road at difficult corner - claim against the local authority responsible for maintenance of road - whether local authority responsible for gravel being on road - content of duty of care - foreseeability of risk of harm - breach of duty by depositing gravel on road and/or failing to erect appropriate sign - causation - contributory negligence - failure of driver to keep a proper lookout - DAMAGES - nature a