Tweed Conservation Zone Review - Stage 1 Tweed Coast
Watch- Status date
- 3 Sept 2025
- Exhibition
- ·
- Gazettal
- ·
- Outcome
- Approved
Tweed Shire Council
Council profile →- Amendments tracked
- 13
- Last 12 months
- 4
- DAs / yr
- 955
- Approval rate
- 80%
Stage history
-
Lodged
source label: “pre-exhibition/Gateway Implementation”
Status date 3 Sept 2025 · Observed 12 June 2026 → current
More in Tweed Shire Council
- Cudgen Connection Post-exhibition· 12 June 2026
- 824 Terranora Road, Bungalora (Lot 1 DP 792256) Lodged· 22 May 2026
- Planning Proposal for Lot 1 DP 818394 at Clothiers Creek Road in Bogangar Withdrawn· 22 Apr 2026
- Kingscliff Locality Plan & Tweed DCP Section B 26 Implementation Withdrawn· 10 July 2023
- Tweed LEP 2014 - Wardrop Valley Road - Potential Employment Land Area 6 Withdrawn· 20 Sept 2022
- Tweed LEP 2014 - Rezoning of 7 hectares of land at Winchelsea Way, Terranora to enable the development of approximately 20 rural residential allotments. Withdrawn· 6 Sept 2021
Planning disputes in Tweed Shire Council
Tribunal and court decisions naming this council, newest first. A signal of contested development in the area, not legal advice.
- Denise Lyn Hurley v Tweed Shire Council [2026] NSWLEC 6 NSWLEC· 6 Feb 2026· Denise Lyn Hurley v Tweed Shire Council [2026] NSWLEC 6 PRACTICE AND PROCEDURE – motion to dismiss proceedings or, in the alternative that various claims be struck out – whether enforcement of a deed of settlement and release between the applicant and the respondent falls within the Land and Environment Court jurisdiction as an ancillary matter pursuant to s 16(1A) of the Land and Environment Court Act 1979 (NSW) – whether proceedings relate to subject matter of proceedings settled by deed – whether deed repudiated – whether deed can operate as a bar
- Marano v Tweed Shire Council [2021] NSWLEC 95 NSWLEC· 1 Sept 2021· Marano v Tweed Shire Council [2021] NSWLEC 95 CRIMINAL – appeal against the severity of sentence in Local Court for offence of carrying out development without consent – exercise of sentencing discretion to make s 10(1)(a) order in light of appellant’s circumstances – appeal upheld
- Karlos v Tweed Shire Council [2018] NSWLEC 164 NSWLEC· 24 Oct 2018· Karlos v Tweed Shire Council [2018] NSWLEC 164 MODIFICATION APPLICATION - application to Council to modify 2003 development consent for commercial water extraction - modification seeks approval to use 19-metre articulated tankers in lieu of 6-metre rigid tankers - application refused by Council - appeal against refusal - leave granted during hearing to amend modification application to seek further modification by removal of conditions having the effect, relevantly, of imposing a maximum annual volumetric rate of extraction on water for comm
- Tweed Shire Council v Furlonger [2015] NSWLEC 107 NSWLEC· 6 July 2015· Tweed Shire Council v Furlonger [2015] NSWLEC 107 CIVIL ENFORCEMENT: works carried out to a caravan and associated structures in a caravan park; consent required but not obtained; works also breach specific provisions of the regulations; discretion whether to order removal or rectification; discretion exercised, limited rectification ordered to effect compliance COSTS: costs ordinarily follow the event; applicant initially seeks specific relief including one order without any factual basis and another which, in its scope, was beyond power; appl
- Tweed Shire Council v Gennacker Pty Ltd [2015] NSWLEC 3 NSWLEC· 30 Jan 2015· Tweed Shire Council v Gennacker Pty Ltd [2015] NSWLEC 3 APPEALS: appeals by prosecutor from dismissal of charges in Local Court against caravan park owner for failing to comply with orders to remove caravan and to install tie- downs on caravans – whether appeals on a question of law alone – meaning of “owner” – appeals dismissed with costs.
- Tweed Shire Council v Furlonger [2014] NSWLEC 156 NSWLEC· 30 Sept 2014· Tweed Shire Council v Furlonger [2014] NSWLEC 156 PROSECUTION - motion by defendant for summary dismissal - charge under s 628 Local Government Act 1993 of failure to comply with council order under s 124 - under s 628(5) it is a sufficient defence if defendant satisfies court that defendant unaware of fact that activity in respect of which offence arose was the subject of s 124 order - defendant unaware of s 124 order or earlier mandatory s 132 notice of intention until after summons served - under s 144 an order is given by serving a copy on