Rezone and reclassify Council owned land being Lot Y DP387680 Part of 4 Pennant Ave, Gordon

Stage history

1. Withdrawn

   source label: “withdrawn/Not Proceeding”

   Status date 13 Sept 2022 · Observed 12 June 2026 → current

More in Ku-ring-gai Council

• Amendment KLEP2015 - Floor Space Ratio (FSR) Provisions for Dual Occupancy Assessment· 12 June 2026
• Planning Proposal - Derriwong Road and Old Northern Road, Dural Post-exhibition· 30 May 2026
• 1364-1396 Pacific Highway, and 1, 1A and 3, 3A Kissing Point Road, Turramurra Assessment· 29 Mar 2026
• 345 Pacific Highway, Lindfield (98 dwellings and 3,285m2 commercial floor space) Withdrawn· 25 Nov 2025
• 95-97 Stanhope Road, Killara (Lourdes Retirement Village) Withdrawn· 2 July 2024
• Lourdes Retirement Village - 95-97 Stanhope Road, Killara Withdrawn· 12 Oct 2022

Planning disputes in Ku-ring-gai Council

Tribunal and court decisions naming this council, newest first. A signal of contested development in the area, not legal advice.

• Charara v Ku-ring-gai Council [2019] NSWLEC 183 NSWLEC· 28 Nov 2019· Charara v Ku-ring-gai Council [2019] NSWLEC 183 PROCEDURE – appeal against stop work order in Class 1 proceedings – unilateral assumption of nullity of development consent and invalidity of construction certificates by local council underpinning stop work order – all issues arising should be determined in Class 4 proceedings
• Palmer v Ku-ring-gai Council [2018] NSWLEC 16 NSWLEC· 16 Feb 2018· Palmer v Ku-ring-gai Council [2018] NSWLEC 16 ORDER APPEAL - appeal against
• Ku-ring-gai Council v Abroon [2010] NSWLEC 176 NSWLEC· 21 Sept 2010· Ku-ring-gai Council v Abroon [2010] NSWLEC 176 PRACTICE AND PROCEDURE :- application to vacate
• Ku-ring-gai Council v Minister for Planning (No 2) [2008] NSWLEC 276 NSWLEC· 2 Oct 2008· Ku-ring-gai Council v Minister for Planning (No 2) [2008] NSWLEC 276 Costs :- judicial review proceedings in Class 4 of Court's jurisdiction - costs where no hearing of an issue on the merits - whether respondent surrendered to applicant or whether there was a supervening event which removed the subject of the dispute such that there should be no order as to costs - whether on another issue unsuccessful applicant brought proceedings in the public interest such that there should be no order as to costs - whether disentitling conduct by successful respondent such t
• Ku-ring-gai Council v Minister for Planning & Anor [2008] NSWLEC 174 NSWLEC· 21 May 2008· Ku-ring-gai Council v Minister for Planning & Anor [2008] NSWLEC 174 Judicial Review :- Validity of order by Minister for Planning appointing a planning panel under s 118(1)(b) of Environmental Planning and Assessment Act 1979 - whether invalid on any of following grounds - whether failed to take into account a mandatory relevant consideration - whether failed to obtain concurrence of Minister for Local Government as required by s 118(8) - whether invalid because of prior Ministerial direction made under s 55 - whether denial of procedural fairness - whether coun
• Ku-Ring-Gai Council v Faigan [2007] NSWLEC 767 NSWLEC· 19 Nov 2007· Ku-Ring-Gai Council v Faigan [2007] NSWLEC 767 Civil Enforcement :- whether local government order complied with - exercise of discretion to make order to remove items Civil Enforcement:- whether independent use of front yard for storage and mechanical repairs which required consent under the Environmental Planning and Assessment Act 1979