Proposal to change minimum lot size of Part Lot 17 DP 1196235, Gundy Road Scone from 4 hectares to 1 hectare

Stage history

1. Withdrawn

   source label: “withdrawn/Not Proceeding”

   Status date 2 May 2022 · Observed 12 June 2026 → current

More in Upper Hunter Shire Council

• 610 Seaham Road, Nelsons Plains Withdrawn· 30 Aug 2022
• 2-4 Philip St & 2 Muffett St, Scone - Rezone Withdrawn· 30 Jan 2021

Planning disputes in Upper Hunter Shire Council

Tribunal and court decisions naming this council, newest first. A signal of contested development in the area, not legal advice.

• David Casson trading as Casson Planning & Development Services v Upper Hunter Shire Council (No 2) [2017] NSWLEC 149 NSWLEC· 13 Nov 2017· David Casson trading as Casson Planning & Development Services v Upper Hunter Shire Council (No 2) [2017] NSWLEC 149 APPEAL - proposed subdivision - proposal to subdivide an undersized rural allotment into two allotments - alleged errors of law by Commissioner - Commissioner concluded that two provisions of a local environmental plan (LEP) were not available to permit approval of the subdivision - Commissioner further considered that, if one of the provisions of the LEP was available, as a matter of discretion, its provisions were not satisfied - case run
• Darley Australia Pty Ltd v Walfertan Processors Pty Ltd [2012] NSWCA 48 NSWCA· 22 Mar 2012· Darley Australia Pty Ltd v Walfertan Processors Pty Ltd [2012] NSWCA 48 LOCAL GOVERNMENT - building control - development application - principles - whether application in respect of "designated development" - Environmental Planning and Assessment Act 1979 (NSW), s 77A - identification of "existing or approved development" - Environmental Planning and Assessment Regulation 2000 (NSW) Sch 3, Pt 2, cl 35 APPEAL - appeal from Land and Environment Court - whether order or decision on question of law - where decision required formation of opinion appeal available if deci
• Walfertan Processors Pty Limited v Upper Hunter Shire Council & Ors (No 4) [2010] NSWLEC 108 NSWLEC· 31 Aug 2010· Walfertan Processors Pty Limited v Upper Hunter Shire Council & Ors (No 4) [2010] NSWLEC 108 APPEAL :- section 56A appeal of commissioners' decision in class 1 proceedings - whether commissioners erred in considering environmental impacts of alterations and additions to existing effluent disposal system from tannery to determine if not designated development by virtue of cl 35 Sch 3 of EP&A Regulation - whether failure to consider intensification of existing use provisions of EP&A Act in relation to tannery - whether errors of fact can be raised as questions of law - whether issue not r
• Walfertan Processors Pty Limited v Upper Hunter Shire Council & Ors (No 5) [2010] NSWLEC 109 NSWLEC· 31 Aug 2010· Walfertan Processors Pty Limited v Upper Hunter Shire Council & Ors (No 5) [2010] NSWLEC 109 COSTS :- whether fair and reasonable to order costs be paid in class 1 proceedings in exercise of court's discretion - consideration of court rule on costs in class 1 proceedings - whether either party acted unreasonably - whether applicant failed to bring forward information necessary to enable consideration of its development application - need to consider overall circumstances of litigation in determining how discretion ought be exercised
• Newcastle & Hunter Valley Speleological Society Inc v Upper Hunter Shire Council and Stoneco Pty Limited (No 2) [2010] NSWLEC 104 NSWLEC· 23 June 2010· Newcastle & Hunter Valley Speleological Society Inc v Upper Hunter Shire Council and Stoneco Pty Limited (No 2) [2010] NSWLEC 104 APPEAL :- objector appeal against Council's decision to grant consent to limestone quarry - conditions of consent
• Newcastle & Hunter Valley Speleological Society Inc v Upper Hunter Shire Council and Stoneco Pty Limited [2010] NSWLEC 48 NSWLEC· 31 Mar 2010· Newcastle & Hunter Valley Speleological Society Inc v Upper Hunter Shire Council and Stoneco Pty Limited [2010] NSWLEC 48 APPEAL :- objector appeal against Council’s decision to grant consent to limestone quarry – whether species impact statement (‘SIS’) required - whether endangered ecological community (‘EEC’) present on project site - whether vulnerable species listed under Threatened Species Conservation Act 1995 present on project site – whether likely significant impact on EEC or listed vulnerable species - no likely significant impact on EEC or vulnerable species – no SIS required - uncertainty as to presenc