Planning Proposal - 16-18 & 21 Cusack Place, Yass
Watch- Status date
- 15 Jan 2026
- Exhibition
- 4 Oct 2022 – 6 Nov 2022
- Gazettal
- ·
- Outcome
- Approved
Yass Valley Council
Council profile →- Amendments tracked
- 3
- Last 12 months
- 2
- DAs / yr
- 317
- Approval rate
- 67%
Stage history
-
Withdrawn
source label: “withdrawn/Not Proceeding”
Status date 15 Jan 2026 · Observed 12 June 2026 → current
More in Yass Valley Council
Planning disputes in Yass Valley Council
Tribunal and court decisions naming this council, newest first. A signal of contested development in the area, not legal advice.
- Lachlan Haskins v Yass Valley Council [2026] NSWLEC 14 NSWLEC· 19 Feb 2026· Lachlan Haskins v Yass Valley Council [2026] NSWLEC 14 PRACTICE AND PROCEDURE — whether Class 1 appeal filed out of time — whether Council had power to determine review under Division 8.2 of the EPA Act — whether period in s 8.3(2)(a) of the EPA Act had expired — whether there was a changed determination within the meaning of s 8.4 of the EPA Act even though original refusal was upheld — whether review determination was a decision subject to appeal within the meaning of s 8.6 of the EPA Act COSTS — r 3.7 of the Land and Environment Court Rules 2007
- Elimatta Pty Ltd v Read and Anor [2021] NSWLEC 75 NSWLEC· 13 July 2021· Elimatta Pty Ltd v Read and Anor [2021] NSWLEC 75 ADMINISTRATIVE LAW — Ground of review other than procedural fairness — Decision contrary to law — Statutory construction — Irrelevant and relevant considerations — Whether decision-maker formed the required states of satisfaction ADMINISTRATIVE LAW — Procedural fairness — Consideration of objection to development application
- Alexander v Yass Valley Council [2011] NSWLEC 148 NSWLEC· 1 Sept 2011· Alexander v Yass Valley Council [2011] NSWLEC 148 JUDICIAL REVIEW - whether apprehension of bias established where conflict of interest in council exercising functions under Environmental Planning and Assessment Act 1979 in relation to land owned by it - whether failure to properly consider heritage issues
- Funtime Investments Pty Limited v Yass Valley Council [2004] NSWLEC 322 NSWLEC· 22 Oct 2004· Funtime Investments Pty Limited v Yass Valley Council [2004] NSWLEC 322 Costs :- Concurrence of Chief Judge with Commissioner's decision Court mechanisms intended to facilitate efficient disposition of planning appeals Fair and reasonable costs to compensate adversely affected party