Palmers Island Rural Supplies store

Stage history

1. Withdrawn

   source label: “withdrawn/Not Proceeding”

   Status date 15 Aug 2023 · Observed 12 June 2026 → current

More in Richmond Valley Council

• Additional Permitted Use on Lot 22 DP 628242, 202 Caniaba Road, Caniaba Post-exhibition· 10 Feb 2026
• PP2019/0001 - Industrial Land Rezoning - 3243 Bruxner Highway (Hare Street) Casino Withdrawn· 15 June 2022
• PP2019/0003 - Industrial Land Rezoning - Bruxner Highway (Johnston Street) Casino Withdrawn· 15 June 2022
• Richmond Valley LEP 2012 - Rezone Lots 100 to 111 DP 755627 Bruxner Highway, Casino, from RU1 Primary Production to IN1 General Industrial and apply a 750m2 minimum lot size Withdrawn· 25 Aug 2021
• Rezoning of land at 48 Lincoln Avenue and Amendment to the minimum lot size at 49 Lincoln Avenue, McLeans Ridges Withdrawn· 25 Aug 2021
• Rezoning Johnston Street, Casino from from RU1 Primary Production to IN1 General Industrial Withdrawn· 13 May 2021

Planning disputes in Richmond Valley Council

Tribunal and court decisions naming this council, newest first. A signal of contested development in the area, not legal advice.

• MacLean v Richmond Valley Council [2026] NSWCA 66 NSWCA· 22 Apr 2026· MacLean v Richmond Valley Council [2026] NSWCA 66 APPEALS — Leave to appeal — appeal brought out of time — extension of time granted — application for leave to appeal from a decision that the Council did not owe and did not breach the duty of care alleged — issues of principle — leave to appeal granted NEGLIGENCE — Personal injury — pedestrian tripped against a “raised lip” on concrete footpath in early morning light — internal Council policy for the assessment and maintenance of footpaths — whether Council owed a duty of care to respond to the
• Goldcoral Pty Ltd (Receiver and Manager Appointed) v Richmond Valley Council [2024] NSWLEC 77 NSWLEC· 31 July 2024· Goldcoral Pty Ltd (Receiver and Manager Appointed) v Richmond Valley Council [2024] NSWLEC 77 ENVIRONMENT AND PLANNING – Consent development application – concept proposal for residential subdivision and detailed proposal for first stage – prior unauthorised works for different subdivision – whether development consent can be granted to amend and use some unauthorised works – mapped coastal wetlands on land – subdivision of whole land but not part of land mapped coastal wetlands – whether development is designated development – applicable environmental planning instrument – current instr
• Goldcoral Pty Ltd v Richmond Valley Council (No 2) [2023] NSWLEC 106 NSWLEC· 17 Oct 2023· Goldcoral Pty Ltd v Richmond Valley Council (No 2) [2023] NSWLEC 106 PRACTICE AND PROCEDURE – notice of motion to vacate hearing – notice of motion to review Registrar’s decision
• Richmond Valley Council v JLT Risk Solutions Pty Ltd (No 2) [2023] NSWSC 273 NSWSC· 24 Mar 2023· Richmond Valley Council v JLT Risk Solutions Pty Ltd (No 2) [2023] NSWSC 273 COSTS – indemnity costs – whether plaintiff should have known that its case was hopeless prior to the commencement of the final hearing - no question of principle
• Richmond Valley Council v JLT Risk Solutions Pty Ltd [2022] NSWSC 1761 NSWSC· 19 Dec 2022· Richmond Valley Council v JLT Risk Solutions Pty Ltd [2022] NSWSC 1761 CONTRACT – where plaintiff and defendant were parties to a deed establishing a mutual risk scheme for the pooling of local councils’ property and public liability/professional indemnity risks and the insurance of those pooled risks – where plaintiff was a local council whose risks had been pooled and insured in accordance with the deed since 2000 and defendant was the manager of the scheme – where plaintiff and each other party to the deed appointed the defendant to advise the Board of the schem
• Young v Richmond Valley Council [2021] NSWCA 255 NSWCA· 26 Oct 2021· Young v Richmond Valley Council [2021] NSWCA 255 APPEALS — Leave to appeal — where applicant seeks leave to appeal from summary dismissal — where applicant had brought proceedings for recovery of land against party other than the registered proprietor — where no viable claim