Hornsby LEP 2013 - Increase building height and FSR at Hornsby Town Centre East Precinct

Stage history

1. Withdrawn

   source label: “withdrawn/Withdraw”

   Status date 21 Apr 2021 · Observed 12 June 2026 → current

More in The Council of the Shire of Hornsby

• PP 1, 3-9, 11 and 13 Spring St, 56, 66-70 and 72-76 Archer St, 35 Albert Ave, Chatswood Withdrawn· 7 May 2026
• Rezoning of South Dural precinct to permit urban development Withdrawn· 12 Sept 2020
• Hornsby RSL Club site (374 dwellings) - to permit residential flat buildings and increase the height of buildings for three sites Withdrawn· 12 Sept 2020

Planning disputes in The Council of the Shire of Hornsby

Tribunal and court decisions naming this council, newest first. A signal of contested development in the area, not legal advice.

• Hayward v Hornsby Shire Council [2024] NSWLEC 106 NSWLEC· 17 Oct 2024· Hayward v Hornsby Shire Council [2024] NSWLEC 106 PRACTICE AND PROCEDURE – Notice of Motion seeking summary dismissal of judicial review proceedings – r 13.4 of the Uniform Civil Procedure Rules 2005 (NSW) – majority of grounds of judicial review proceedings failed to disclose a reasonable cause of action – leave granted to re-plead one paragraph of Summons
• Hornsby Shire Council v Valuer General of New South Wales & Ors [2013] NSWSC 1183 NSWSC· 27 Aug 2013· Hornsby Shire Council v Valuer General of New South Wales & Ors [2013] NSWSC 1183 EVIDENCE - whether appropriate for trial judge to view property the subject of compensation determination - scope of view - purposes of view - Evidence Act 1995, ss 53 and 54.
• Hornsby Shire Council v The Valuer General of New South Wales [2013] NSWSC 1026 NSWSC· 12 July 2013· Hornsby Shire Council v The Valuer General of New South Wales [2013] NSWSC 1026 EVIDENCE - application for advanced ruling pursuant to s 192A of Evidence Act - further expert evidence sought to be relied upon - whether applicant can show real or substantial prejudice - interests of justice require all issues to be determined at trial - no prejudice in reliance on additional expert evidence - no general point of principle
• Hornsby Shire Council v Valuer General of New South Wales (No 2) [2013] NSWSC 510 NSWSC· 18 Apr 2013· Hornsby Shire Council v Valuer General of New South Wales (No 2) [2013] NSWSC 510 PROCEDURE - motion to amend statement of claim - many previous amendments- late amendment sought -- no justification for additional amendments to statement of claim provided -- exercise of judicial discretion to allow or disallow amendments - parties must address issues in proceedings comprehensively and in a timely manner - overriding purpose of the Civil Procedure Act 2005 is not attained -no point of general principle
• Hornsby Shire Council v The Valuer General of New South Wales [2012] NSWSC 894 NSWSC· 2 July 2012· Hornsby Shire Council v The Valuer General of New South Wales [2012] NSWSC 894 PRACTICE AND PROCEDURE - Notice of motion seeking firstly leave to have the administrative law proceedings heard and determined first, and
• Mathews v The Uniting Church in Australia Property Trust (NSW) [2011] NSWLEC 198 NSWLEC· 15 Nov 2011· Mathews v The Uniting Church in Australia Property Trust (NSW) [2011] NSWLEC 198 PROCEDURE - setting aside or staying subpoena to produce - whether "conduct money" required for subpoena to produce documents - Uniform Civil Procedure Rules 2005 r 33.6(1) - addressee of subpoena entitled to loss and expenses incurred in producing documents - Uniform Civil Procedure Rules r 33.11 - tender of cheque as conduct money - relevance of documents to be produced - whether deponent of affidavit filed in proceedings is "stranger" to the proceedings - motion dismissed