Amendment to LEP Land Reservation Acquisition Map and Clause 5.1 to facilitate Roberts Lane, Hurstville road widening

Stage history

1. Withdrawn

   source label: “withdrawn/Withdraw”

   Status date 24 Mar 2021 · Observed 12 June 2026 → current

More in Georges River Council

• Planning Proposal to introduce an Additional Permitted Use to 1 Highworth Avenue, Bexley Post-exhibition· 5 May 2026
• Hurstville Golf Course Clubhouse (57 Lorraine St, Peakhurst) Post-exhibition· 16 Mar 2026
• Hurstville Golf Course Clubhouse Planning Proposal Withdrawn· 8 Aug 2025
• PP2020/0001 - 19-25 Macquarie Place and 46-56 Pitt Street, Mortdale Withdrawn· 4 Apr 2023
• PP2019/0003 - Planning Proposal for 143-149 Boundary Road and 689-691 Forest Road, Peakhurst Withdrawn· 20 Mar 2023
• Hurstville Civic Centre Withdrawn· 24 Mar 2021

Planning disputes in Georges River Council

Tribunal and court decisions naming this council, newest first. A signal of contested development in the area, not legal advice.

• Georges River Council v Faltas (No 2) [2025] NSWLEC 97 NSWLEC· 11 Sept 2025· Georges River Council v Faltas (No 2) [2025] NSWLEC 97 COSTS — Failure to comply with an order issued under s 124 of the Local Government Act 1993 (NSW) — Whether usual costs order should be made — Whether Council acted unreasonably — Costs follow the event — Respondent to pay Council’s costs
• Georges River Council v Faltas [2025] NSWLEC 85 NSWLEC· 13 Aug 2025· Georges River Council v Faltas [2025] NSWLEC 85 CIVIL ENFORCEMENT — Failure to comply with an order issued under s 124 of the Local Government Act 1993 (NSW) — Declaration and orders made to restrain and remedy breach — Further time granted for compliance
• Georges River Council v Eskander [2024] NSWLEC 98 NSWLEC· 26 Sept 2024· Georges River Council v Eskander [2024] NSWLEC 98 APPEAL — Appeal on a question of law — Appeal pursuant to s 56A of the Land and Environment Court Act 1979 (NSW) — Appeal against a Commissioner’s decision — Whether Commissioner was satisfied that adequate arrangements had been made for suitable vehicular access when required — The fact that there was an existing application to obtain an easement cannot amount to an arrangement — Proceedings remitted back to Commissioner for consideration
• Georges River Council v SAF Developments Pty Ltd [2023] NSWLEC 50 NSWLEC· 10 May 2023· Georges River Council v SAF Developments Pty Ltd [2023] NSWLEC 50 ENVIRONMENTAL OFFENCES: carrying out development contrary to consent – unlawful transportation or depositing of waste – pleas of guilty – sentencing principles – extent of environmental harm – state of mind during the commission of the offences – whether state of mind of project manager could be attributed to company – totality principle applied – comparable cases – fine imposed – publication order made.
• Pyramid Consulting Pty Ltd v Georges River Council [2022] NSWLEC 141 NSWLEC· 17 Nov 2022· Pyramid Consulting Pty Ltd v Georges River Council [2022] NSWLEC 141 PRACTICE AND PROCEDURE – application for separate question – appeal against refusal of a development application for a boarding house – separate question concerning whether the repealed or current housing State environmental planning policy applies to the development application – determining question separately from other issues not justified – separate identification of relevant matter of environmental planning instrument to be considered in determining development application not appropriate
• Commitment Pty Ltd v Georges River Council; (No 2) [2022] NSWLEC 94 NSWLEC· 3 Aug 2022· Commitment Pty Ltd v Georges River Council; (No 2) [2022] NSWLEC 94 APPEAL - separate questions of law in Class 1 proceedings