85-91 Thomas Street, Parramatta (+12 Dwellings)
Watch- Status date
- 1 Apr 2022
- Exhibition
- 27 Oct 2021 – 17 Nov 2021
- Gazettal
- ·
- Outcome
- Approved
City of Parramatta Council
Council profile →- Amendments tracked
- 32
- Last 12 months
- 7
- DAs / yr
- 738
- Approval rate
- 82%
Stage history
-
Withdrawn
source label: “withdrawn/Not Proceeding”
Status date 1 Apr 2022 · Observed 12 June 2026 → current
More in City of Parramatta Council
- 31 O'Connell Street and 9 Albert Street, North Parramatta Post-exhibition· 5 June 2026
- Fitzwilliam St, Parramatta Assessment· 5 June 2026
- Planning Proposal for land at 90-94 Phillip Street, Parramatta. Assessment· 30 May 2026
- Parramatta Road Corridor Urban Transformation Strategy (PRCUTS) – Stage 2 Lodged· 24 May 2026
- Westmead South Planning Proposal Withdrawn· 16 Oct 2025
- 23-27 HAROLD STREET, PARRAMATTA Withdrawn· 5 Aug 2025
Planning disputes in City of Parramatta Council
Tribunal and court decisions naming this council, newest first. A signal of contested development in the area, not legal advice.
- City of Parramatta Council v Transport for NSW [2026] NSWSC 294 NSWSC· 31 Mar 2026· City of Parramatta Council v Transport for NSW [2026] NSWSC 294 ADMINISTRATIVE LAW – whether reviewable error of law – jurisdictional fact – whether existence of a registered interest in land in a jurisdictional fact – whether a registered planning agreement is a legal interest in land
- Darley v City of Parramatta Council [2025] NSWSC 990 NSWSC· 29 Aug 2025· Darley v City of Parramatta Council [2025] NSWSC 990 ADMINISTRATIVE LAW – local government – judicial review – complaint about councillor – Local Government Act 1993 (NSW) – Council’s Code of Conduct and applicable administrative procedures – construction of Act, Code and procedures – whether conduct reviewer and investigator adhered to the Code and procedures – whether complaints co-ordinator acted contrary to the Code and procedures – whether complaints co-ordinator exceeded authority – whether general manager adhered to requirements of Act – wh
- City of Parramatta Council v Sydney Metro [2024] NSWLEC 23 NSWLEC· 21 Mar 2024· City of Parramatta Council v Sydney Metro [2024] NSWLEC 23 LAND LAW — Compulsory acquisition — Compensation — Assessment of amount payable — Market value — Adjoining owner premium — Special value — Disturbance
- Chatterton v City of Parramatta Council [2022] NSWSC 1603 NSWSC· 23 Nov 2022· Chatterton v City of Parramatta Council [2022] NSWSC 1603 LAND LAW – statutory modification of easements – where two rights of way granted in 1922 to provide access to public road – where character of land changed from rural land to suburbia – where dominant tenements are now a reserve owned by Council and subdivided lots – where pedestrian use continues – where obstacles on right of way and long period of non-use by motor vehicles and other modes of transportation – whether easement allows users to go to, from and across land – whether continued exist
- City of Parramatta Council v Sydney Trees Excavation and Demolition Pty Ltd [2021] NSWLEC 71 NSWLEC· 7 July 2021· City of Parramatta Council v Sydney Trees Excavation and Demolition Pty Ltd [2021] NSWLEC 71 ENVIRONMENTAL OFFENCES: defendant convicted of three offences of breaching the Environmental Planning and Assessment Act 1979 – guilty pleas – sentencing principles – extent of environmental harm caused by the commission of the offences – state of mind of offender at the time of the commission of the offences – objective seriousness of the commission of the tree removal offences moderate – objective seriousness of the commission of the tree protection offence low – no prior convictions – remorse
- City of Parramatta Council v Grand Epping Pty Ltd [2021] NSWLEC 70 NSWLEC· 2 July 2021· City of Parramatta Council v Grand Epping Pty Ltd [2021] NSWLEC 70 ENVIRONMENTAL OFFENCES: defendant convicted of two offences of aiding, abetting, counselling, or procuring breaches of s 4.2(1)(b) of the Environmental Planning and Assessment Act 1979 – guilty plea – sentencing principles – extent of environmental harm caused by the commission of the offences – state of mind of offender at the time of the commission of the offences – objective seriousness of the commission of the tree removal offence moderate to high – objective seriousness of the commission of