49-51 Molong Road - Reclassification

Stage history

1. Withdrawn

   source label: “withdrawn/Withdraw”

   Status date 24 Sept 2025 · Observed 12 June 2026 → current

More in Orange City Council

• Molong East Planning Proposal Post-exhibition· 1 June 2026
• 49-51 Molong Road Reclassifcation Assessment· 19 Feb 2026
• Amendment 26 to Orange LEP 2011 to facilitate retail development at 1517 Forest Road- Alteration of Gateway determination Withdrawn· 8 June 2021
• WITHDRAWN -Orange LEP 2011 - Amendment 15 - Increase HOB from 12m to 20m at 194 Anson Street, Orange Withdrawn· 28 Nov 2020
• WITHDRAWN - Orange LEP 2011 Amendment 11 - Orange Airport Withdrawn· 28 Nov 2020
• Anita Motel Site Redevelopment - Orange Withdrawn· 28 Nov 2020

Planning disputes in Orange City Council

Tribunal and court decisions naming this council, newest first. A signal of contested development in the area, not legal advice.

• Orange City Council v Willis [2026] NSWCA 51 NSWCA· 14 Apr 2026· Orange City Council v Willis [2026] NSWCA 51 APPEALS — appeal from findings of fact — whether the primary judge erred in finding the Council had actual knowledge of the risk which caused the harm — whether knowledge of particular class of Council persons required – whether the primary judge erred in failing to find the liability arose from road works for the purpose of s 45 of the Civil Liability Act 2002 (NSW) — whether the primary judge erred in failing to find that the claim relied on the exercise of a special statutory power for the pu
• Kudrynski v Orange City Council [2024] NSWCA 33 NSWCA· 22 Feb 2024· Kudrynski v Orange City Council [2024] NSWCA 33 APPEALS – s 57(1) Land and Environment Court Act 1979 (NSW) – requirement for appeal to be from an order or decision on a question of law – deficiencies in the notice of appeal – whether any of the 24 grounds met this requirement COMPULSORY ACQUISITION – Compensation – vacant land acquired by local council for public purpose of stormwater harvesting project – highest and best use of land for rural residential development – appellants sought $160 million compensation below and on appeal
• Kudrynski v Orange City Council [2023] NSWLEC 9 NSWLEC· 17 Feb 2023· Kudrynski v Orange City Council [2023] NSWLEC 9 COMPULSORY ACQUISITION: flood prone vacant land acquired by the council for the public purpose of stormwater harvesting project – land constrained by easements and affected by traffic noise – highest and best use of the land is for rural-residential development – limited comparable sales evidence – adoption of hypothetical development approach –application of statutory disregard – claim that stormwater harvesting project either unfeasible or illegal irrelevant to proceedings – limited weight pla
• Hewatt Pty Ltd v Orange City Council [2020] NSWSC 1662 NSWSC· 23 Nov 2020· Hewatt Pty Ltd v Orange City Council [2020] NSWSC 1662 CIVIL PROCEDURE – separate question – whether there should be a separate determination of the merits of the plaintiff’s claim under the Building and Construction Industry Security of Payment Act BUILDING AND CONSTRUCTION – whether by reason of s 16(4) of the Building and Construction Industry Security of Payment Act the defendant would not be able to bring a cross claim against the plaintiff
• Australian Childcare Solutions v Orange City Council [2018] NSWLEC 93 NSWLEC· 20 June 2018· Australian Childcare Solutions v Orange City Council [2018] NSWLEC 93 APPEAL – appeal against Commissioner’s decision on questions of law – refusal of development consent for childcare centre – whether Commissioner misdirected herself and asked the wrong question in construing provisions of development control plan – whether Commissioner substituted her own test for the test in development control plan – Commissioner did not err on question of law in construing and applying development control plan
• Nessdee Pty Limited v Orange City Council (No 2) [2017] NSWLEC 182 NSWLEC· 19 Dec 2017· Nessdee Pty Limited v Orange City Council (No 2) [2017] NSWLEC 182 APPEAL – heliport – amendment of development application – order for payment of costs thrown away – appeal upheld – development consent granted on conditions